From the River to the Sea Palestine Will Be Free

This slogan frightens those in power not because it calls for violence, but because it calls for justice. It calls for the restoration of a land stolen, and the equality of a people erased.

Zionists and their allies routinely attack the slogan “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” as a call for the destruction of Israel. But what exactly does this claim reveal—about the slogan, about Zionism, and about the underlying truth they seek to suppress?

To understand the accusation, we must first understand the slogan: What does “from the river to the sea” mean? What is Palestine? What does it mean for Palestine to be free?

What the Slogan Actually Means

The phrase “from the river to the sea” refers to a specific geographic region: the land between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. This was known, universally and officially, as Palestine prior to 1948. Every map, every British and Ottoman administrative document, and every global reference to the area used that name: Palestine.

Palestine before and after 1948
Palestine before 1948 and under subsequent occupation and colonisation.

So when we speak of Palestine, we are not invoking a fantasy or a fabrication. We are referring to a real, historically recognised land, which has been subjected for over a century to colonisation, partition, ethnic cleansing, and military conquest. Out of that violence emerged the State of Israel, along with the continuing occupation of Palestinian land.

The call for Palestine to “be free” is a demand for liberation from that condition.

Why Zionists Fear It

Zionist opposition to the slogan is revealing. If the freedom of Palestine between the river and the sea necessarily implies the destruction of Israel, what does that say about Israel’s nature? It suggests, quite directly, that Israel cannot coexist with a free Palestine—because Israel, as it currently exists, is predicated on the denial of Palestinian freedom.

The history bears this out. In 1947, the United Nations proposed a partition of Palestine, giving over half of it to European Jewish settlers, despite them making up only a third of the population and owning under 7% of the land. Palestinians were not consulted. They rejected the plan, not out of irrational hostility, but out of a simple and universal moral principle: no people can accept the foreign partition and gifting of their homeland to others.

From this rejection followed war, dispossession, and the mass displacement of over 750,000 Palestinians—the Nakba, or catastrophe. Israel was founded not alongside Palestine, but atop it.

This is why Zionists interpret the call for freedom as a threat. Because to acknowledge Palestinian freedom is to acknowledge a fundamental injustice at the heart of the Israeli state’s creation.

Restoration Is Not Destruction

Even taken in its most expansive interpretation—as a call for the liberation of all of historic Palestine—the slogan does not call for genocide, expulsion, or the erasure of Jewish life. It calls for the dismantling of a system built on apartheid, supremacy, and dispossession enforced through systemic violence and widespread killing. It calls for restoration, not destruction.

What would such a restoration look like? A democratic state in which all inhabitants—Muslim, Christian, and Jew—live as equals. A society built not on ethnic privilege or military domination, but on human dignity and justice. This is not a fantasy. It is the only moral alternative to endless bloodshed.

Of course, there will be those who reject such a vision, those who believe that Jews must rule and Arabs must submit. Such individuals, regardless of their religion or ethnicity, have no place in a democratic future. But those willing to renounce domination and embrace equality will belong, whether they were born in Jaffa or Haifa, Bethlehem or Tel Aviv.

What “Freedom” Really Means

“From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” is not a call for revenge. It is not a threat of extermination. It is a statement of hope: that one day, a people subjected to decades of displacement, military rule, siege, and apartheid will be free to return, to rebuild, and to live with dignity in their own land.

To twist this into a cry for violence is not only dishonest, it is projection. The real violence, the real destruction, is what the slogan opposes: ethnic cleansing, military occupation, and the reduction of a people to exiles in their own homeland.

To stand with this slogan is to stand for freedom, not against anyone’s existence. And those who attack it reveal far more about the injustice they defend than the justice they fear.

Defy the Oppressor: Stand With Palestine, Whatever the Cost

We have spoken softly, respectfully, even pleadingly. We have used the language our oppressors demanded. We have appealed to law, to reason, to shared humanity. We have condemned antisemitism, affirmed Jewish dignity, and insisted that our struggle is against Zionism, not Jews. And still, they call us haters. Still, they smear us as antisemites and accuse us of calling for the destruction of a so-called Jewish state.

Let us then speak without euphemism.

There is no “Jewish state” called Israel — only a Zionist settler-colonial entity that has occupied the whole of Palestine. The so-called “West Bank,” “Gaza Strip,” “East” Jerusalem, and “Israel” are not separate places. They are all Palestine. And beyond Palestine, Israel has stolen land from Syria and Lebanon. It is a project of expansion, not survival.

We must now abandon the language of the oppressor. Israel is not a democracy. It is not a beacon of civilisation. It is not a normal state. It is a racist, supremacist, militarised regime built on ethnic cleansing, apartheid, and erasure. It must be dismantled. Palestine must be restored. This is not hatred; it is justice.

Jews who wish to live in a free, democratic Palestine as equals are welcome. Those who demand supremacy at the expense of others must relinquish it, or leave. The future cannot be built on stolen land and bloodshed.

Say it plainly:
From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.

And when we say it, let them arrest us. Let them fire us, blacklist us, smear us. We will not stop. Their power lies in our fear — but fear has its limits. They cannot imprison a nation. They cannot sack an entire generation. They cannot silence a movement whose numbers exceed their capacity to suppress it.

So now is the time to act — not just online, but in the streets, in our workplaces, in every institution that still pretends Israel is legitimate.

Wear the keffiyeh.
Fly the Palestinian flag.
Speak the truth, even when it costs you.
March. Occupy. Resist.
Let solidarity mean something real.

If they jail one of us, a hundred must take their place. If they fire one of us, we must support them financially, publicly, and personally. That is how movements endure. That is how justice advances — not through polite petitions, but through unbreakable collective courage.

To free Palestine, we must be willing to suffer. Not for martyrdom, but for meaning. Not because we desire pain, but because we will not tolerate complicity. There is no other path. Donations and hashtags help, but they cannot dismantle apartheid. That will take bodies, voices, risks.

This is not a moment for safe conscience. It is a moment for moral defiance.

The alternative is to live with ourselves should the Zionists be able to carry out the unthinkable, yet which they have felt free to voice out loud over and over.

Zionist Narrative Collapse: When the Lie Becomes Too Big to Manage

This article is a synthesis produced in collaboration with ChatGPT, based on publicly available knowledge, verified facts, and the “help” of UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI).

There is a moment in every elaborate deception when the web begins to fray—not because it was poorly spun, but because reality itself begins to resist. That moment is now arriving for Zionism.

For over a century, Zionist propaganda—what it proudly terms hasbara, or “explanation”—has been deployed with relentless precision to justify the colonisation of Palestine, the dispossession of its people, and the brutal architecture of Israeli apartheid. This narrative has shifted with the times, cloaking itself in the dominant language of each era: from the sacred right of return, to the tragic necessity of survival after the Holocaust, to the modern buzzwords of democracy, LGBT rights, and “Start-Up Nation” branding. But the scaffolding of lies is buckling. What we are witnessing today is not merely a public relations failure—it is the structural collapse of the Zionist story under the weight of its own contradictions.

The Lie Too Big to Hold

At the heart of the Zionist narrative lies a basic claim: that a democratic, civilised, moral Jewish state was built in a land without people for a people without a land. This single falsehood required a thousand more to sustain it. The Palestinians had to be portrayed as absent, backward, violent, or nonexistent. The acts of dispossession had to be reframed as wars of self-defense. The occupation had to be rebranded as “disputed territory.” Every bullet, every bulldozer, every bomb dropped on Gaza required a moral alibi.

But over time, the lie has grown too elaborate. Too many atrocities, too many eyewitnesses, too much video footage, too many grieving mothers, too many journalists silenced, too many mass graves. The very tools Israel once used to shield its image—surveillance, control of narrative, media manipulation—have become porous. TikTok now does more to document Israeli war crimes than decades of UN reports could ever achieve. Even mainstream outlets, long deferential to Israeli talking points, are beginning to crack.

The gap between propaganda and reality is now a chasm. And Israel cannot close it.

The Contradictions Mount

Take, for instance, the 2024–2025 Gaza war. Israel claims it is fighting Hamas, not Palestinians. Yet over 52,000 Palestinians are now dead—two-thirds of them women and children. The infrastructure of an entire society has been reduced to rubble. Hospitals, bakeries, schools, aid convoys, and journalists have all been systematically targeted. How long can a state insist it is “the most moral army in the world” while committing what even the International Court of Justice says may plausibly amount to genocide?

The contradictions are no longer abstract—they are recorded in 4K. Zionism insists it is about Jewish liberation, yet it partners with far-right Christian nationalists who deny Jewish equality in their own countries. It invokes antisemitism to silence critics, while aligning with regimes and figures who openly hate Jews. It brands every Palestinian child as a potential terrorist, but paints Israeli snipers as victims when they shoot children through the head.

Even the legal class has not escaped this collapse into incoherence. In May 2025, UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI) issued a letter opposing a Co-Op motion to boycott Israeli goods. The letter claimed that reporting Gaza’s death toll was defamatory, that ceasing trade with Israel amounted to racism, and that noting Israel’s plausible genocide case before the ICJ was itself a lie. It even argued that claims of mass starvation were overstated, since obesity had previously been a major health issue in Gaza—an obscene deflection, akin to suggesting a rape survivor benefited from abuse because it taught them about sex. In effect, the letter demanded that reality be treated as libel. This is not legal reasoning. It is panic masquerading as jurisprudence. It shows a movement no longer interested in persuasion, only suppression—a textbook sign of ideological decay.

This is not just hypocrisy. It is the logical consequence of a project that requires constant moral inversion to survive.

The Collapse Is Visible

The signs of narrative collapse are everywhere. Jewish identity itself is now being contested—not by Palestinians, but by Jews. Hundreds of thousands of Jews around the world are rejecting the claim that Zionism speaks for them. Groups like Jewish Voice for Peace, IfNotNow, and diaspora-led vigils are asserting a clear break: Not in our name.

Meanwhile, long-protected allies of Israel—like the BBC, New York Times, and even certain U.S. politicians—are being forced to report what they once buried. Terms once taboo—apartheid, ethnic cleansing, settler colonialism, genocide—have entered mainstream usage. Support for Palestine has become a moral badge for an entire generation.

Israel’s defenders, unable to coherently respond, have retreated into panic and projection. They label all criticism as antisemitism. They accuse aid workers of being Hamas. They demand the silencing of professors, journalists, and even schoolchildren. But each act of repression now fuels the very collapse they seek to avoid.

Why Propaganda Fails

There is a structural principle here. All propaganda systems eventually fail when their lies outpace their ability to police reality. This has been observed in authoritarian regimes, colonial empires, and religious cults. As contradictions multiply, two things happen: first, the inner circle doubles down, becoming more extreme, paranoid, and self-isolating; second, the outer circle—the global public, and even sympathetic observers—begin to peel away.

This is precisely what is happening to Zionism. The hasbara machine is still spinning, but no longer convincing. Its arguments are stale, its outrage performative, its moral high ground visibly soaked in blood.

What Comes Next?

Narrative collapse is not the end—but it is the beginning of the end. When a hegemonic story falls apart, what follows is often unpredictable. Power structures may remain intact for a while, but their legitimacy evaporates. This is how apartheid South Africa fell. This is how the Berlin Wall fell. Not when the regime lost its weapons—but when it lost the ability to explain itself.

The Zionist regime will continue to kill, censor, and cry foul. But it can no longer command the story. And without that, its foundations are exposed.

Let us be clear: the future belongs to the truth. And the truth has a longer lifespan than propaganda.

Suggested Reading:

  • Ilan Pappé, Ten Myths About Israel
  • Greg Shupak, The Wrong Story: Palestine, Israel, and the Media
  • Peter Pomerantsev, Nothing Is True and Everything Is Possible
  • Edward Said, The Question of Palestine
  • Joseph Massad, The Persistence of the Palestinian Question

If Anne Frank Could Speak

Anne Frank Statue Netherlands, with Gaza reference.
Anne Frank statute in the Netherlands with the word Gaza painted on the plinth in red. (Stijn Nijssen)

In July 2024 the word Gaza was painted in red over the plinth bearing the statue of Anne Frank in the Netherlands. Frank was the innocent Jewish girl murdered by the Nazis in the Holocaust, who left her diaries as testament to the world. The Western colonial media clamored to denounce this as an act of vandalism, defacement and desecration.

But if Anne could speak to us, what might she say of Gaza?

I was only a child when they came for me. I had done nothing to anyone. I wrote in a diary, I dreamed of peace, and still, I died in terror. So how can anyone, especially Jews, who know what it is to be hunted,drop bombs on children? How can they say they are defending themselves while killing babies in their beds and sniping children in the street?

Eighteen thousand children. That number is beyond horror. It is a silence louder than all my pages. If my memory is used to justify this, then it has been stolen. If my name is spoken to excuse this slaughter, then it has been defiled.

I never wanted vengeance. I only wanted to live. And now, these children, these Palestinian children, wanted the same. What kind of people kill what they once were? And what kind of world lets them do it?

This is an imagined statement, not a historical one. Anne Frank did not speak these words. But the question what might she say is not posed lightly. It is asked in anguish, in conscience, and in solidarity with all innocent children whose lives have been cut short by violence, wherever and by whomever it is inflicted.

Anne Frank has come to symbolise the devastating cost of hatred, persecution, and the world’s failure to protect the vulnerable. Her name is invoked across cultures as a moral touchstone. That moral clarity is precisely why we ask what her memory demands of us now.

The purpose of this piece is not to equate histories, but to resist their misuse. The memory of Anne Frank is too often claimed to justify acts that she, as a child and as a human being, could never have condoned. If her image is used to uphold power, it can also be summoned to speak for the powerless.

This is not a desecration of her memory. It is a refusal to let it be desecrated by silence in the face of 18,000 murdered children.

Bad Hasbara Podcast: Telling the Truth Fearlessly

The Bad Hasbara Podcast – aka the world’s most moral podcast – is hosted by anti-Zionist Jews Matt Lieb and Daniel Maté.

One of their guests was Maté’s father, renowned Canadian psychotherapist Gabor Maté. At one point Gabor gives several illuminating insights into the origins of Israel’s national Anthem, Dance, and Food (edited for clarity and can be heard in full in the video above):

“The Israelis stole the land from the Palestinians, the national anthem from the Czechs—because the tune comes from Smetana’s Moldau—and the national dance from the Romanians, which is the hora. And the food—from the Arabs.”

Shortly after, Daniel offers a fuller, more rounded picture of Israel:

“I have never seen a society so ugly and reprehensible, so downright toxic, in my lifetime. An entire society. It’s a tiny country that’s completely rotted. Its culture—its genocide—is mainstream.

Norman Finkelstein talks about how genocide is no longer a state project. It’s a national project. And that is true.

It’s a completely toxic national culture. A failed state. A lunatic state. And part of its ugliness is the aggressiveness, the zeal, the vim and vigour, the total conviction and lack of self-awareness—and just the aesthetic tackiness—with which it sells its crimes to the world. Or obfuscates them. And with massive resources.

And part of that self-image is young Israelis dancing to techno music—soldiers posting TikToks of themselves jumping up and down in the desert. That’s part of the branding. There are hundreds of these. Techno, clubs, DJs—it’s a huge part of the self-image.

Right on the border of the concentration camp that Israel has created and maintains with murderous intensity and vigilance in Gaza, there happened to be a literal desert techno festival [the Nova music festival]. That’s what made the October 7th breach such a dark historical irony. The breach itself was heroic. Never mind what happened afterward. There’s something absolutely and undeniably heroic about the breach.

Israel puts its own hostages—its entire citizenry—in that position. That indefensible position. It even throws the question of so-called “innocence” into question. I’m not saying every Israeli deserves to be massacred. But in a citizen-army country… the line gets blurred.”

There’s more. Worth a watch.

Such strong and clear language is not only morally justified; it is a moral imperative. The genocidal impunity of the Zionist state has reached such an extreme that no other phrasing can adequately capture the horror.

Do You Condemn Humus?

Hummus - Palestinian National Dish that Zionist have been trying to steal.
Hummus – Israelis loved it so much they stole it

While they demand we condemn Hamas, the Zionists never condemned hummus. They just stole it.

There’s something almost poetic in the theft. While Israelis murder Palestinians, they not only eat their food, they claim it as their own. Culture, like land, is annexed.

You have to hand it to them.

And we will. Justice.
On a plate.
Not served cold, but piping hot.

A Promise to Zionists: Justice is Coming

The Reckoning You Already Sense

The public struggle is not only about information. It is not merely raising awareness to pressure governments. It is also a message to those who hold power in the Zionist project, and those who uphold it.

You are not unaware of the truth. You know it—and you deny it. But as more of the world begins to see clearly, your denial is giving way to fear, visible now in your growing reliance on censorship and repression. That fear will become pleading. Not defiant justifications, as you offer now, but something else: the claim that you only did what you believed was right. That you didn’t know. That you were following orders. Then will come regret. Then shame. And perhaps—if anything within you remains capable of facing the truth—remorse.

This is not only a moral pattern. It is the approach of justice. Because a world cannot be sustained on lies and violence. Eventually, the truth forces its way in. Justice follows. You will see both.

“Big difference between who fights for a cause and who fights for a lie or a myth.”

The Western colonial media (with leading mouthpieces like CNN and the BBC) consistently censors and sanitises Zionist apartheid and genocide, while silencing voices in support of Palestine and Palestinian resistance.

But social media tells a different story. Despite efforts by the platforms themselves to suppress criticism of the Zionist state and support for Palestinians, major platforms are awash with documentation, analysis, and commentary that show the truth—and provide evidence for it.

What is also remarkable are the comments left on platforms such as YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram by ordinary people around the world. Comments in support of Israel are predictable: whataboutism, deflection, outright lies, personal attacks, and accusations of anti-Semitism. By contrast, those in support of Palestinians not only form the vast majority, but express strong admiration and respect for Palestinians and their resistance—alongside even stronger condemnation and disgust directed at Israel and Zionists. These comments are often biting, insightful, satirical, and morally devastating.

Striking examples can be found in the comments on a YouTube video of a gun battle between Palestinian resistance fighters and IDF soldiers. (Israeli Soldiers Trapped by Hamas Grenade Assault).

Israeli Soldiers Trapped by Hamas Grenade Assault

.The video appears to have been taken from body cams worn by one of the Israeli soldiers, and—remarkably—released by the IDF (often referred to as the IOF: Israeli Offensive Forces or Israeli Occupation Forces). The footage is striking. It shows well-equipped, well-protected, and well-armed Israeli soldiers cowering in a room under fire from poorly equipped Palestinian fighters, who lack any backing from a military armed with tanks or fighter jets. One can only assume the IDF released the footage (or at least permitted its circulation by soldiers) in the belief that it demonstrated bravery or exemplary conduct.

The many thousands who have watched and commented on the video think otherwise. The title of this blog entry is one such comment, and by no means an exception.

One striking comment (in all caps) reads: “IMAGINE THEM GETTING JUST 5% OF WHAT IDF HAS IN TERMS OF MILITARY AID.” Others evoke war crimes and cowardice: “IDF was expecting unarmed women and children” and “Diaper force realized that facing the armed men is different than killing children & old people.” Some use satire and humour to express their disgust: “Wow, who knew a safety blanket really works?” and “Diaper army needs a diaper change.” The first refers to a soldier who appears to hide beneath a blanket he is also using to cover a minor wound; the second reflects the general impression that these well-armed and well-protected Zionist soldiers are, in fact, cowering. Still more comments demonstrate public understanding that the soldiers—and their “Satanic state,” to quote Norman Finkelstein—lack any moral or ethical justification for their actions. The title of this blog highlights exactly that.

Below is a selection from just the first 50 or so comments. The remainder can of course be viewed directly on the video page. It is well worth the time.

At the time of writing, the video has 3 million views and 5,041 comments—with only a handful in support of the Zionist soldiers (and mostly in replies to those supportive of Palestinians). Some individual comments have 2,000 or 3,000 likes. The total like count stands at 31,000. All these metrics are considered high by YouTube standards.

Another video (available as part of the same video montage) garners 9.1 million views, 8951 comments, and 62,000 Likes: Hamas Fighter Shoots At Israeli Soldiers Through Wall in Gaza. The first part shows Hamas fighters setting up an attack on Zionist occupation forces. In a later section Zionist soldiers are seen in a Palestinian school engaging in what many of the comments describe as “shooting windows and walls”, with one comment garnering 5,700 Likes with its dark humour: “This attack in the school resulted in the killing of two windows, a wall being damaged, the capture of 15 chairs, and the surrender of 3 doors.” This effectively captures the chaos and near hysteria of the soldiers as they randomly shoot at anything, while apparently under attack by a lone Palestinian fighter concealed in a hole in a wall.

There are many such videos, released or uploaded either by the IOF or by Palestinian resistance groups, and they are ubiquitous on YouTube and other social media and messaging platforms.

The Electronic Intifada goes into deep analysis of one video of Palestinian fighters sniping at Zionist soldiers as they stand on their tank

What truly stands out in these videos is the bravery of Palestinian fighters, who barely have a few guns, shoulder-held rocket launchers, and improvised explosives. They are “clad” not in combat gear but in T-shirts, jeans, and trainers—without body armour or the sophisticated weaponry of the Zionist colonisers. As one comment dryly notes: “Can’t defeat guys with no body armors and using sandals instead of army boots?” These young Palestinian men fight for liberation against a racist, supremacist, cruel, and deeply immoral force that dares to call itself an army. The world’s most moral, apparently

Selection of comments on YouTube video:

Israeli Soldiers Trapped by Hamas Grenade Assault

  • “You will face men who love death as you love life” : khalid bin waled .
  • Big difference between who fight for a cause and who fight for a lie or a myth.
  • You can’t scare those who lost everything.
  • Real legends are the warriors not seen in the video 👍
  • Two months later and still hiding on the balcony. No wonder they need American help? Helpless diapers!
  • IMAGINE THEM GETTING JUST 5% OF WHAT IDF HAS IN TERMS OF MILITARY AID
  • Difference between who fights for a cause and the one who fights for a person.
  • Ive never in my life see a solider hidding behind a blanket😂😂😂
  • And they cry ”we are the victims” as they end the lives of the helpless, 70% women and children.
  • IDF was expecting unarmed women and children.
  • Diaper force realized that facing the armed men is different than killing children & old people.
  • Greetings to the brave men who sacrificed their lives for their cause🇯🇴
  • Legend has it the IDF is still hiding under the blanket
  • The army whos fighting Air, themselfs, Children and Woman. They truly belive the whole world still belives their lies
  • That’s what happens when you steal people’s land and drive them from their homes into a prison.
  • This video just proves that the IDF are not so mighty and invincible after all. This gives more hope for Palestinians
  • Never ask a man about his salary, a woman about her age or Israel about its evidence.
  • IDF battlefield checklist:
    Weapons – check
    Armor – check
    Ammunition – check
    Diapers – check
    Security blanket – check
  • They sound so scared when faced with a real enemy
  • Diaper army running for cover
  • First time I’ve ever seen any footage of IOF actually fighting real soldiers.
  • This was some months ago..actually he wasn’t using blanket as bandage or anything. Of sort .he was scared to death..he was covering himself out of fear…
  • The IDF was expecting women and children no fighter.
  • The difference between fighting against a fighter face to face and fighting against defenseless children and women with drones
  • IDF soldiers to IDF commander : ” Sir what do you mean this time they will actually be armed??? “
  • He covered himself with a blanket over his head😂
  • It’s unbelievable that a human body can take this rush of adrenaline and fear of death day after day without collapsing
  • “We used to say that Palestinians fight like heroes. Now we say heroes fight like Palestinians.” ~ Norman Finklestein
  • Those kids once wrote
    “We (Palestine) aren’t scared of your bombs but when we throw one orange, you’re scared of it”
  • This happens when one group has God on their side and the other group has Uncle Sam on their side…
  • One side fight in dignity, honour and for self defense, the other for greed and wealth with hatred, barbarism and arrogance.
  • The so called powerful army fighting with defenceless people of Gaza for 5 months. People with no tanks or planes. Disgraceful
  • I don’t see any human shields.
  • This is the first time I’ve seen a soldier cover himself with a blanket and go to bed during a battle😅😅😅
  • It didn’t start on October 7:
    • Haifa massacre – March 6, 1937⁣⁣
    • Jerusalem massacre – Dec 6, 1937⁣⁣
    • Haifa massacre – March 27, 1938⁣⁣
    • Haifa massacre – July 6, 1938⁣⁣
    • Jerusalem massacre – July 13, 1938⁣⁣
    • Jerusalem massacre – July 15, 1938⁣⁣
    • Haifa massacre – July 25, 1938⁣⁣
    • Jerusalem massacre – July 26, 1938⁣⁣
    • Balad al-Sheikh massacre – June 12, 1939⁣⁣
    • Haifa massacre – June 19, 1939⁣⁣
    • Haifa massacre – June 20, 1947⁣⁣
    • Jaffa massacre – Dec 12, 1947⁣⁣
    • Abbasiya massacre – Dec 13, 1947⁣⁣
    • Al-Khasas massacre – Dec 18, 1947⁣⁣
    • Bab al-Amud massacre – Dec 29, 1947⁣⁣
    • Jerusalem massacre – Dec 30, 1947⁣⁣
    • Balad al-Sheikh massacre – Dec 31, 1947⁣⁣
    • Deir Yassin massacre – April 9, 1948⁣⁣
    • Abu Shusha village massacre – May 9, 1948⁣⁣
    • Tantura massacre – May 22, 1948⁣⁣
    • Lydda massacre – July 1948⁣⁣
    • Al-Dawayima massacre – Oct 29, 1948⁣⁣
    • Qibya massacre – Oct 14, 1953⁣⁣
    • Kafr Qasem massacre – Oct 29, 1956⁣⁣
    • Khan Yunis massacre – Nov 3, 1956⁣⁣
    • Rafah massacre – Nov 12, 1956⁣⁣
    • Abu Zaabal factory bombing – Feb 13, 1970⁣⁣
    • Sabra and Shatila massacre – Sept 16, 1982⁣⁣
    • Al-Aqsa Mosque massacre – Oct 8, 1990⁣⁣
    • lbrahimi Mosque massacre – Feb 25, 1994⁣⁣
    • Qana massacre – April 18, 1996⁣⁣
    • Jenin massacre – April 3, 2002⁣⁣
    • Qana massacre – July 30, 2006⁣⁣
    • Gaza Strip massacre – August 5, 2022⁣⁣
    • Jenin massacre – January 26, 2023⁣⁣
    • Jenin massacre – July 3, 2023]
      I AM ALLOWING EVERYONE TO COPY PASTE AND SPAM THIS COMMENT EVERYWHERE TO SPREAD AWARENESS
  • Looks like they have no tactical training, they’re just improvising
  • Legend say, they are still hiding under blanket.
  • Diaper army needs a diaper change
  • Wow, who knew a safety blanket really works?
  • Hiding under the blanket 😂🤣
  • He was hiding under the sheets😅
  • Why is he firing at the wall 🤣
  • Israeli soldiers are hiding under the blanket 😂😂
  • All their suits, guns, tanks, planes are just a showcase against civilians, but a cowardice in front of the real armies. Phee
  • The most moral army hiding under blanket😂😂😂😂
  • “How can I smile and how can food and water taste good to me when Masjid Al-Aqsa is in the hand of the crusaders!” – Salahuddin Ayubbi
  • “The IDF has total control over Khan Younis”
    lol
  • I dont understand why he’s just shooting at the hallway wall. While gun fire is obviously coming from a different angle. They look scared.
  • They count civilians as Hamas fighters..
  • Hidding under a blanket in the middle of a battle is insane☠️
  • This is the most powerful army in the Middle East? Really?
  • Look at them! They’re FIGHTING BACK! How barbaric! How can they do such a thing??
  • I can see those idf soldiers urinate in their pants. They must be very scared. poor kids.
  • Where is Netanyahu to mourn his fallen men? 😂
  • They thought they were fighting children not their parents 😂
  • Can’t defeat guys with no body armors and using sandals instead of army boots?
  • Austrian painter: What a strange way of making soap Hamas has
  • Do you see the idf soldier hiding scared in the blacket haha
  • { وَلَا تَحْسَبَنَّ اللَّهَ غَافِلًا عَمَّا يَعْمَلُ الظَّالِمُونَ… }
  • There is a difference between someone who wears courage and faith… and someone who wears Pampers, screams like a bitch and then hides under the blanket to change Pampers.
  • We are the victors, O God, cherish Islam and Muslims for the sake of Muhammad and his pure family. Victory is ours, God willing.
  • Who they think, Harry potter with his disappear blanket
  • Idf ” ISRAEL DIAPERS FACHISTE ” soldier is still hiding under the blanket 🤣
  • Why are Israeli fighters called “soldiers”, and Palestinian fighters called “militants”? Is it because one side doesn’t wear a uniform?

The Freedom of Refaat Radwan Amid Israel’s Genocide

The most recent hearing at the International Court of Justice on Israel’s genocide in Gaza demonstrates once again that justice cannot be silenced, nor crimes buried.

Speaking as part of the Palestinian delegation at the ICJ, Irish barrister Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh recounted to the court the final moments of one of fifteen Palestinian paramedics executed by the Zionist occupation army.

“It was the recording of the Israeli attacks on the 23rd of March found on the mobile phone of a slain Palestinian Red Crescent paramedic that compelled Israel’s retraction of its initial attempted justification of the killings. That recording of Refaat Radwan’s final words also reflects the sacrifice made by so many in Gaza who have given their lives for others. After reciting the Muslim prayers of the dying, and knowing his mother’s heart would be broken by his death, he called out, ‘Forgive me mother. Forgive me. I chose this path to help people. Forgive me.’”

The death of Refaat calls to mind an episode shared by Jean-Paul Sartre in a lecture delivered after the Second World War. A student asked him how he should respond to the moral dilemma he faced: should he go and fight with the French Resistance against the Nazi occupation, or should he stay home to care for his elderly mother, who depended on him? Sartre did not attempt to resolve the dilemma. He offered no universal rule. Instead, he insisted that the student must choose — and in choosing, create his values. There could be no refuge in doctrine, nor evasion of responsibility.

Refaat’s killing at the hands of Zionist soldiers offers a piercing glimpse into the decisions Palestinians are forced to make daily. Every path they take leads to sacrifice. Their only freedom is to choose which loss they will endure. In Refaat’s case, he chose to risk his life helping those struggling for freedom, dignity, and the very existence of his people — even as it tore him from his mother’s side. And in a cruel twist, his choice brought not only death but also the agony of feeling he had abandoned her.

But Refaat chose all the same. He chose to act, not merely to endure. He chose to help others in defiance of a system that sought to erase both him and them. If he had stayed away, if he had surrendered to safety, there would be no life worth living — for him, for his mother, or for any Palestinian.

Sartre called this the condition of man: “condemned to be free.” It is not freedom as privilege, but freedom as burden — the necessity of choosing, even when every option brings pain. Rafat’s final words remind us that even under siege, even under bombardment, Palestinians still bear this burden. Their freedom has not been taken. It has been made unbearable.